Vice President Kamala Harris is the clear and obvious person Americans need to vote for in Tuesday’s presidential election. Her views on abortion access, education, immigration, and healthcare make her the most progressive and honorable candidate in this election, and we students at The AMSA Voice feel duty bound as a staff to endorse her candidacy.
One of Ms. Harris’s first priorities is to win the fight for a woman’s reproductive rights. She has sponsored, investigated, and championed various bills and acts that ease barriers to abortion access.
One of these is the Reproductive FACT Act that Ms. Harris co-sponsored during her time as California’s attorney general. The act mandated, among other things, that crisis pregnancy centers notify their patients that although abortion care is not offered at these centers, it is available elsewhere in the state.
“Ours is a fight for the future, and it is a fight for freedom, like the freedom of a woman to make decisions about her own body and not have her government tell her what to do,” Ms. Harris said during a campaign event in Ann Arbor, Mich., on Oct. 28.
Ms. Harris has pledged – if such a bill is passed by Congress – to sign into law legislation that restores the federal right to abortion.
“Any threat to women’s reproductive rights is very personal to me, which is something that has made me more invested in this election,” English teacher Paige Percoskie said.
Young people have so much potential to influence this election. Circle, a research organization based at Tufts University, reports that Gen Z makes up about 40 million potential voters. According to polling data, Ms. Harris is winning the hearts of Gen Z by a landslide.
According to Newsweek, Ms. Harris is ahead among young voters on almost every major issue, including the economy, healthcare, and social issues. The vice president has said numerous times that she loves Gen Z, and she believes its call for change is inspiring and invigorating.
“But also I think for young women to see a female president in their lifetime at a younger age, and knowing in the next election there could be two women who are the final candidates, could be really powerful,” Mrs. Percoskie said.
As a school newspaper, The AMSA Voice has a vested interest in education, and Ms. Harris has education as a primary focus, including improving working conditions and pay for teachers, a much needed change.
With the rise of book bans and curriculum changes, it is an unstable time for teachers. We believe putting a president in office who will work to protect teachers’ rights and protect intellectual freedom, including access to controversial literature, is crucial.
The Democratic Party platform also calls for expansion of social and emotional support for students and for increased funding for English language learner education.
Ms. Harris understands the importance of diversity and equality within education, and attended a historically black university, Howard University in Washington, D.C. It gives her a perspective on diversity in higher education that no other presidential candidate has had.
Criticism that Ms. Harris has failed on the job over the past four years, and blaming her alone for the troubles of the administration of President Joe Biden, is both unfair and illogical. The vice president has very little actual power, and Mr. Biden’s presidency is his, not that of Ms. Harris, who has her own ideas and plans for the future.
Immigration policy is an overriding issue of this campaign. Republican candidate Donald Trump takes a consistently degrading and insulting approach when talking about immigrants. He persistently pushes xenophobic ideals, disregarding a massive portion of America’s population. Ms. Harris takes an alternative approach, promising to make significant changes once elected.
“I had many students who were really upset and genuinely scared [when talking about the issue], especially students who were children of immigrants,” AMSA history department Chair Brianna Murphy said of the 2016 election, when Mr. Trump adopted a similar approach to the issue.
Mr. Trump’s often violent imagery concerning immigrants instills fear in every part of the population, and his solution to the immigration issue seems focused almost solely on deporting millions of people currently in the country.
Ms. Harris recognizes the many challenges in fixing the problem, but she has promised to close all privately run immigration detention centers, as well as help clear an easier path to gaining citizenship.
Both immigrants and Americans at large are facing a severe housing crisis, which Ms. Harris has vowed to address; her plan includes financial assistance for first-time home buyers.
On a larger economic scale, Mr. Trump’s primary goal of tax cuts will primarily benefit the high upper class, and his current plan on taxes and tariffs, according to experts, will significantly increase the national debt.
Ms. Harris plans to target support for small businesses and working families above all else. Part of her economic plan is to restore the Expanded Child Tax Credit, helping parents with low-income jobs support their families and children more effectively.
Ms. Harris additionally plans to cut taxes for working people, while working to lower healthcare, food, prescription drug, and energy costs.
It is simply impossible, when looking at Mr. Trump’s presidency, his three campaigns, and his career, to overlook his disrespect for people and institutions and his contempt for seemingly everything that doesn’t serve him. This runs the gamut from rudely interrupting opponents during debates to being convicted of 34 felonies.
As the young people who will one day inherit this country and take responsibility for it, we want to endorse a candidate who differs from Mr. Trump, someone who will approach the presidency with respect, eloquence, and with the best interest of the American people in mind. With that, Kamala Harris is the right woman for the job, and we believe she will meet America’s needs.
Michael • Nov 5, 2024 at 1:05 pm
Well written.
For those who disagree with the opinions presented in this editorial, please understand that historically it has long been an expectation of all newspapers that their editorial staff endorse political candidates. The endorsement and a well stated explanation for that endorsement are put forth to promote informed voting decisions.
The NY Times has endorsed candidates going back to Lincoln in 1860. These endorsements should be taken as any other editorial. They are opinion pieces, written by the editorial staff. If you disagree with any opinion, consider it an opportunity to engage in productive discourse and civil debate.
Jason • Nov 5, 2024 at 1:59 pm
I’ll try again: the premise and content of this article are wildly inappropriate for a school publication. And a teacher in a position of authority speaking to students about abortion is way over the line. Either publish one objective story or two opposing editorials…or just stay out of it. This is not The NY Times.
Alyssa Giugliano • Nov 5, 2024 at 3:46 pm
You’re right, no school should endorse a political candidate. Nevertheless, the AMSA Voice is not AMSA. The students on the AMSA Voice do not speak for all of AMSA (students or staff), they speak for themselves, and this is the candidate they decided to endorse.
Emily Pollard • Nov 5, 2024 at 5:13 pm
Hi Jason. It would be entirely hypocritical for us to publish two opposing editorials. It is labeled an editorial because it is the opinion held by everyone writing for The AMSA Voice. Also, abortion is a topic that we felt we must talk about with people because it affects us and the entirety of America, and one of the teachers at AMSA felt it was important to talk about as it is a big topic and debate within this election. This article was written by students who independently hold these beliefs, and was not at all influenced by a teacher. The fourth estate (the press) is dedicated to bringing the truth to the people and keeping the other estates in line, which in our case makes us duty bound to share our belief about who should be the next president. The content of this article will directly impact students and the rest of America, so I do not understand why you believe this is inappropriate to talk about.
Julie Gagen • Nov 5, 2024 at 8:27 am
Great article! Yes to investing in education and congrats on a well researched piece. It’s so incredibly important for us, as parents, to raise student voices and to listen to the perspective of young people, regardless of how we choose to vote.
Yes, the youth of today will inherit this country. What we choose to support in this election, just as every other local and national election, will directly affect their future. It’s great to see the time and thought put forward to develop a perspective. And it’s brave to share it here!
Sorry there are not more adults speaking up in support of your words. Sometimes our own selfishness blinds the responsibility we have as adults, parents, and guardians to have thoughtful discourse and meaningful conversations with young people and provide space for you to develop your own thoughts and opinions. Keep sharing your voice, it’s an essential part of a healthy democracy and a just and fair world.
sophie • Nov 4, 2024 at 9:56 pm
this article shouldnt be allowed. overall trump is better. case rested. most of my classmates at amsa prefer trump as well.
Giovanna Landioso • Nov 5, 2024 at 1:04 pm
Why do you think this article shouldn’t be allowed? Just because it supports a candidate you disagree with? One of the things about a school newspaper is that it provides a platform for diverse opinions, and this piece represents one perspective on the upcoming election. If you disagree why don’t you write your own article. And saying “Trump is better” without giving any reasons doesn’t make for a strong argument. If you believe that he’s the better choice, then maybe back it up with some facts. It would make your point a lot stronger.
Iryna • Nov 4, 2024 at 9:52 pm
Why would the school allow it? It is obviously not vote of everyone at school. Politics should not be a topic. Or if there is a topic – there should be no sides taken.
Emily Pollard • Nov 5, 2024 at 5:15 pm
Hi Iryna. Yes, you are correct, this is not a “vote” of everyone from AMSA. This is an opinion that all the student staff has at The AMSA Voice, which is why it is labeled an editorial. Also, politics is unfortunately all about sides, which is why we have a two-party system. In a democracy like ours, everyone votes on specific issues and we come to a consensus, and you are allowed to vote for either side/candidate that fits your beliefs.
Tuesday Benander • Nov 4, 2024 at 7:54 pm
I absolutely love this piece! The power of your words really resonated with me. Let’s be honest, you three just stated the facts, which is what journalism is all about, and if people can’t deal with the facts, it’s their problem. Keep being brave, keep being true to yourself, and remember that you have so many people in your life who are so incredibly proud of you.
Madison Oxnard • Nov 4, 2024 at 7:46 pm
I am so proud of you all for writing such a touching and powerful piece and having the courage to share your perspectives despite the tense political environment we live in today. I could not have put this in better words myself and wholeheartedly agree with you; our nation cannot survive with Trump as president again.
Aidan Mills • Nov 4, 2024 at 7:24 pm
This article would have been more persuasive if you actually defended Kamala’s opinions. Everyone knows what she believes in and promises; this article didn’t do much explaining as to why Kamala’s views on the mentioned sociopolitical issues are any better than Trump’s. If this was an attempt at persuasion, it could’ve used work, and if this was just for a simple endorsement, it was pointless; what does stating your presidential pick do besides paint the school in a bad light for seemingly publicly stating its political beliefs?
Hunter Hatstat • Nov 4, 2024 at 2:12 pm
trump is more betterer
Ayden Allen-Cordon • Nov 4, 2024 at 1:31 pm
Nice Comedy piece guys!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Dhruv Vallakott • Nov 4, 2024 at 1:28 pm
Overall, I hate politics, like I don’t really support any political party but to be honest, I think the US should bring back Barack Obama because he has done a lot like the Affordable Care Act and he created many plans for clean energy. The only thing I value is caring for the environment and Barack Obama has created The Climate Action Plan where its role is to preserve forests, encourage alternate fuels, and increase the study of climate change. The only thing I expect a leader to have is an interest in protecting the environment.
Lucian Albota • Nov 4, 2024 at 1:19 pm
Why should schools (and/or school-run pages) get involved in political controversy? And what is this endorsement achieving? Talking about politics and the vigorous exchange and individual testing of political ideology is, in my opinion, completely necessary; but why bring this type of dangerous banter into our school? Schools should be a haven from these divisive issues, a chance to set apart differences in beliefs in order to collectively strive for a quality education. The meddling of schools and school-run pages in politics does nothing but further push divisive issues onto the student population. Extremely bad judgement in posting this article.
Aidan Mills • Nov 4, 2024 at 7:25 pm
Exactly my thoughts
Alyssa Giugliano • Nov 4, 2024 at 8:26 pm
I completely agree with you that conversations about these divisive topics need to be had, which is why I think it’s important that we are offered a platform to share our differing opinions in a school setting. School is a place for learning, growth, and development, so I think it’s the perfect environment to have these discussions, as it only furthers the learning process. The point of the article is for the AMSA Voice to share their opinions and open the door for other students to share theirs. If they had decided to endorse Trump instead, the article would still be published for the same purpose.
Lucian Albota • Nov 5, 2024 at 2:18 pm
In my opinion, nothing about controversial political subjects betters the learning process, and it is dangerous in this particular context. Additionally, the endorsement of a particular political candidate is, in no way, inviting others to share their opinions. The article states it as fact that “Vice President Kamala Harris is the clear and obvious person Americans need to vote for in Tuesday’s presidential election” which alienates anyone who thinks differently. In fact, the article never even mentions that it is an opinion piece, and it is missing in the “opinion” section on this very website. On the other hand, if the students at the AMSA Voice had opened a discussion board on the subject of this election and its candidates (or at least added a way for the students to write their own official articles), maybe that would have strived for a better representation of the voice of the students.
Alyssa Giugliano • Nov 5, 2024 at 3:58 pm
I understand where you’re coming from, however the article is clearly labeled as a “STAFF EDITORIAL.” An editorial is an opinion piece written by the authors (or “editing team”) of a newspaper. This label tells the reader that the contents of the article are the opinions of the editing team.
In terms of the “fairness” of a school newspaper endorsing a political candidate, I think your point is very valid. Perhaps next election year, if people are so passionate about endorsing a different candidate, they can either choose to take the journalism elective, or they can reach out to a teacher/administrator and ask if they would be able to publish their own article.
Anyways, if your opinion still stands that a school newspaper should not endorse any political candidate, then I can absolutely respect your opinion and we can agree to disagree. I do have a question for you, though: If the AMSA Voice had endorsed Trump, would you have posted the same comment?
Lucian Albota • Nov 5, 2024 at 8:59 pm
First of all, I can admit where I was wrong: I was uneducated on the meaning of a “Staff Editorial”. Thank you to the comments that clarified this because the motive for this article makes more sense to me now. This kind of discourse is what founded the principles of this country and it necessary for change to take place.
However, I am completely disgruntled by the way you finalized your second comment. To insinuate that I am a radically conservative Trump voter is completely unwarranted and disrespectful. Not only is that question deeply personal but it also insinuates that I follow a set of political ideals that I never explicitly stated. I am very disappointed by the way you handled this part of what I thought was civil political discourse.
Emily Pollard • Nov 5, 2024 at 5:16 pm
Hi Lucian, thank you for taking the time to comment. First, let me make it clear: An editorial is, inherently, an opinion piece. This opinion must be held by every member of an editorial staff at a newspaper, and in this case it is held by every member of the student staff. Second, most things in your life have to do with politics, including school. AMSA as a public school is funded by federal, state, and local governments, meaning that the money we get and the quality of education we have is determined by these governments. The Department of Education, on both the federal and state levels, is responsible for establishing policies and coordinating federal and state assistance related to the education system. School is supposed to teach us how to nurture our own voices in this world, and to get a quality education you need to be able to know how to form and share your opinions. Nobody is pushing anything onto anyone else, and you had the right to not read this article if it did not serve you. We are not trying to force people to vote for Ms. Harris; we are simply sharing our opinion and stating who we would vote for in this election. If you would like to write your own articles about these topics and others, please join Journalism when you get the chance.
Alyssa Giugliano • Nov 5, 2024 at 9:36 pm
Hi Lucian, I’m responding to your last comment here because there isn’t an option to reply again on that one. I’m glad we could help with the editorial information.
I am so sorry for giving you the impression that I was assuming anything about your political beliefs. That definitely was not my intention and that is why I specifically said that I have a question for you, because it was a genuine question. If I was assuming you would not have left this same comment on a Trump endorsement post, then I would have said something along the lines of “I bet you wouldn’t have said this about a Trump endorsement.” But I don’t know that that’s something you would or would not do, so I was merely asking out of curiosity.
Like I said, if you still believe that the AMSA Voice shouldn’t be endorsing a candidate after our discussion, I absolutely respect that opinion. I just hope that everyone who shares your opinion would argue the same thing regardless of who the article is endorsing. I definitely was not insinuating that you are a radical conservative, just asking a genuine question.
I know that many of the people making comments, whether on this site or just in conversation, who disagree with the endorsement believe this article should not have been published at all. And I know that if the endorsement were for Trump, there would be plenty of people saying the same thing. I just think that it is important that everyone really analyzes why they believe what they believe, and make sure there is no bias, hence why I asked you that question (which I did not expect you to answer out of privacy).
Basically, I just hope that anyone who truly believes the AMSA Voice should not be publishing articles like this believes that regardless of which candidate/party they support, and I am not at all assuming that you, specifically, would change your opinions if the article endorsed Trump instead.
Hopefully this clarifies my intentions with that question, and for the record, I’m really enjoying this discussion! I find it refreshing and informative to be able to have civil conversations like this about controversial topics.
Kaden Chaves • Nov 4, 2024 at 10:28 am
ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhh idk about this
Emanuel • Nov 4, 2024 at 10:02 am
I disagree with this. Trump is a better person for our economy and is going to make a better economy for us to live in and abortion should not be allowed since you are killing people for the parents’ mistakes and them not being responsible.
Giovanna Landioso • Nov 5, 2024 at 7:47 pm
The Tax Policy Center reported that the top 1% saw the largest gains, while many middle-class families barely noticed a difference. These policies are estimated to add around $1.9 trillion to the national debt. Who do you think is going to pay for that? and HOW are we going to be paying that? The higher the debt , the higher the taxes. So, how exactly does that help the economy for Americans? And also as for abortion, saying it’s killing people ignores the fact that this is about a woman’s right to choose. So If you’re a male Emanuel then your opinion about what women should do with their body simply does not matter. Abortion should be legal in most cases. Banning it doesn’t stop it, people will still figure out ways to carry out abortions but just in more dangerous ways. “Abortion is incredibly safe for pregnant people in the U.S., with 0.44 deaths per 100,000 procedures from 2013 to 2017. In contrast, 20.1 deaths per 100,000 live births occurred in 2019”. It’s shown that Pregnancy is more dangerous than abortions and banning that right could lead to far more pregnancy related deaths. So why do you believe that mothers should be forced to carry out their pregnancy when there is the possibility of facing death? Harris ensures that safe access to reproductive healthcare while trump doesn’t, which is crucial.
Lucian Albota • Nov 5, 2024 at 9:31 pm
Ludicrous comment. “If you’re a male Emanuel then your opinion about what women should do with their body simply does not matter.” I think it’s dangerous—erring on deplorable—that you would claim this. To imply that men have no right to hold an opinion on abortion is absolutely misguided since pregnancy between a man and a woman affects both parties. If I was to get a woman pregnant, I would have to bear the burden of parenthood just as much as my wife. The topic of abortion affects all parents including men. Furthermore, to claim that a certain group cannot hold opinions over a certain topic is deranged. Everybody holds the individual and fundamental right to hold an opinion on a topic—regardless of whether it involves someone directly or not.
Raghav • Nov 5, 2024 at 9:50 pm
“So If you’re a male Emanuel then your opinion about what women should do with their body simply does not matter.” You cannot have a logical discourse while discarding the opinions of an entire group, even on the premise that it does not directly affect them (which, in this case, it does). First of all, this is a dangerous thing to say. Let’s extrapolate: Are people unable to have opinions on animal rights? People aren’t animals. Are people born after the abolition of slavery unable to have an opinion on slavery? These things are obviously not directly analogous, but the principle certainly stands. These are deeply personal and ethical issues that have a broad spectrum of perspectives that should all be able to be voiced. People can stand for things without being directly involved in them, and even then, men are clearly involved in pregnancy. Pregnancy is undeniably a concern for men; it’s a joint commitment between men and women, and while women carry more physical (and often total) responsibility, it is, in many ways, a collaborative matter. Women’s voices should indeed be heard, but what kind of claim is it to say that men’s voices should just be discarded? I agree with you that female reproductive rights are important. What I take issue with is the notion of discarding an entire group’s opinions because of the claim that the issue does not pertain to them. Everyone has a right to an opinion, and those opinions should certainly be heard.
Matthew N Hassapes • Nov 4, 2024 at 9:55 am
I disagree.